W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > May 2009

Re: draft response for JC2

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 17:04:42 -0400
Message-ID: <29af5e2d0905151404u2c233760k74aa6d7592211afa@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Peter F.Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org, bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk
I'd leave out the part about empty lexical space.
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#DTYPEINTERP says:

"Formally, a datatype d is defined by three items:
1. a non-empty set of character strings called the lexical space of d;"

However Pat says that this was forced on him for a reason he can't
remember and it is harmless to relax it.

Or perhaps say that the status of empty lexical spaces is
inconsistently documented and that in any case it doesn't cause harm.
Not sure.

You don't address the forward compatibility hook being bad issue that
he raises. Not sure if it matters or not.


On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Peter F.Patel-Schneider
<pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:
> Bijan put together a draft response for JC2, which he and I fiddled with
> until we are both relatively happy with it.  Therefore it *must* be
> perfect.
> We await the inevitable chorus of agreement from the WG at which point I
> will let Bijan garner the eternal glory of sending it out.
> peter
Received on Friday, 15 May 2009 21:05:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:12 UTC