W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > May 2009

Re: OWL Full Features in QRG

From: Jie Bao <baojie@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 13:11:15 -0400
Message-ID: <b6b357670905061011k5e2a4717l5bcb6d3ead8d026f@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: schneid@fzi.de, public-owl-wg@w3.org
Does this look ok to you?

http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Quick_Reference_Guide&oldid=23301#Additional_Vocabulary_in_OWL_2_Full

Jie

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
<pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:
> From: Jie Bao <baojie@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: OWL Full Features in QRG (was Re: Issue-104)
> Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 12:42:29 -0400
>
>> OK. Since all the response so far are against including RDF
>> vocabulary, I'm happy to remove them.
>>
>> How about just list the 5 OWL terms:
>>
>> owl:DataRange, owl:distinctMembers, owl:OntologyProperty,
>> owl:DeprecatedClass, owl:DeprecatedProperty
>>
>> And indicate that owl:DataRange is deprecated in OWL 2, but others are not.
>>
>> As to the name of the section, I still prefer "Additional Vocabulary
>> in OWL 2 Full" than the alternative proposal of "Compatibility
>> Vocabulary", because the later may lead some people to think that
>> those terms are not encouraged to use.
>
> Well, they are not encouraged, at least as far as I am concerned, but I
> don't mind the proposed section name.
>
Thanks!

>> Jie
>
> peter
>



-- 
Jie Bao
http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie
Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2009 17:12:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:12 UTC