W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > May 2009

Re: QRG - a suggestion

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 07:49:44 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20090506.074944.195678735.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: sattler@cs.man.ac.uk
Cc: baojie@cs.rpi.edu, public-owl-wg@w3.org
This organization seems much cleaner to me.

peter

From: Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk>
Subject: QRG - a suggestion
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:26:35 +0100

> Hi Jie, I had another look at the QRG (which looks neater and clearer
> than ever!) and would recommend to turn 2.5 into "Axioms" and move the
> following axioms into it:
> 
> - Class Axioms
> - Property Axioms
> - Datatype Definitions (they are currently in 1 line in the 'data ranges'
> - Table.
> - Keys
> - Assertions
> 
> I think it's conceptually much clearer (and thus might help people
> finding things they are looking for) - what do you think? Cheers, Uli
> 
> ---- Current ToC:
> 
> 2 OWL 2 constructs and axioms
> 
>     * 2.1 Classes
>     * 2.2 Properties
>     * 2.3 Individuals & Literals
>     * 2.4 Data Ranges
>     * 2.5 Keys
>     * 2.6 Assertions
>     * 2.7 Declarations
>     * 2.8 Annotations
>     * 2.9 Ontologies
> 
> 
> 
> ---- Suggested ToC:
> 
> 2 OWL 2 constructs and axioms
> 
>     * 2.1 Classes   %% minus Class Axioms
>     * 2.2 Properties  %% minus Object Property Axioms and Data Property Axioms
>     * 2.3 Individuals & Literals
>     * 2.4 Data Ranges  %% minus "datatype definition"
>     * 2.5 Axioms
>                 %%  Class Axioms
>                 %%  Assertions
>                 %%  Object Property Axioms
>                 %%  Data Property Axioms
>                 %%  Datatype definitions
>                 %%  Keys
>     * 2.6 Declarations
>     * 2.7 Annotations
>     * 2.8 Ontologies
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2009 11:49:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:12 UTC