W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > May 2009

Re: Agenda TC 06/05/2009

From: Christine Golbreich <cgolbrei@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 07:50:17 +0200
Message-ID: <b0ed1d660905052250s7ce0aa21xb07c3d2ce7ce017@mail.gmail.com>
To: Héctor Pérez-Urbina <hector.perez-urbina@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Cc: "Deborah L. McGuinness" <dlm@ksl.stanford.edu>, Evan Wallace <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
So do I, I'm busy whole day at University and can probably not attend
part of the TC.
It would be also useful for NF&R to know in advance of the call  if
there is input required .

Thanks

Christine

2009/5/6 Deborah L. McGuinness <dlm@ksl.stanford.edu>:
> This would be particularly useful.  Unfortunately I have a university
> conflict during the call so it would be useful to determine if there is
> input required in advance of the call.
>
> thanks,
> Deborah
>
> Jie Bao wrote:
>>
>> Can we add pending issues of QRG to the agenda? Some of the discussion
>> may effect other documents as well.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Talk:Quick_Reference_Guide#May_5.2C_2009
>>
>> Jie
>>
>> 2009/5/5 Héctor Pérez-Urbina <hector.perez-urbina@comlab.ox.ac.uk>:
>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> This is a preliminary version of this week's teleconference:
>>>
>>>  1.  Admin
>>>         * Roll call
>>>         * Agenda amendments?
>>>         * PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes (29 April)
>>>         * Action items status
>>>               o Pending Review Actions
>>>               o Due and overdue Actions
>>>                     + Action 333 Review NF&R / Rinke Hoekstra
>>>                     + Action 335 Talk with owlapi people about
>>> strict rdf/xml parsing / Bijan Parsia
>>>  2. Documents and Reviewing
>>>         * LC Working Drafts
>>>               o rdf:text LC comments and responses
>>>               o OWL LC comments and responses
>>>         * First Public & Ordinary Working Drafts (reviews and/or status)
>>>               o QRG
>>>               o NF&R
>>>               o Primer
>>>               o Overview
>>>               o Manchester Syntax
>>>               o DRE (aka N-ary)
>>>         * Handling references
>>>  3. Implementation and Test Cases
>>>         * Progress on tool support, e.g., for "species validation"?
>>>         * Progress report
>>>         * Approving "validated" test cases
>>>               o Comments/objections?
>>>         * Syntactic tests
>>>               o Wanted? needed? possible?
>>>  4. Features "At-Risk" (just a reminder)
>>>         * owl:rational support
>>>         * rdf:XMLLiteral support
>>>  5. Additional other business
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Héctor
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>



-- 
Christine
Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2009 05:50:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:12 UTC