Can we add pending issues of QRG to the agenda? Some of the discussion may effect other documents as well. http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Talk:Quick_Reference_Guide#May_5.2C_2009 Jie 2009/5/5 Héctor Pérez-Urbina <hector.perez-urbina@comlab.ox.ac.uk>: > Hello, > > This is a preliminary version of this week's teleconference: > > 1. Admin > * Roll call > * Agenda amendments? > * PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes (29 April) > * Action items status > o Pending Review Actions > o Due and overdue Actions > + Action 333 Review NF&R / Rinke Hoekstra > + Action 335 Talk with owlapi people about > strict rdf/xml parsing / Bijan Parsia > 2. Documents and Reviewing > * LC Working Drafts > o rdf:text LC comments and responses > o OWL LC comments and responses > * First Public & Ordinary Working Drafts (reviews and/or status) > o QRG > o NF&R > o Primer > o Overview > o Manchester Syntax > o DRE (aka N-ary) > * Handling references > 3. Implementation and Test Cases > * Progress on tool support, e.g., for "species validation"? > * Progress report > * Approving "validated" test cases > o Comments/objections? > * Syntactic tests > o Wanted? needed? possible? > 4. Features "At-Risk" (just a reminder) > * owl:rational support > * rdf:XMLLiteral support > 5. Additional other business > > Regards, > > Héctor > > -- Jie Bao http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojieReceived on Wednesday, 6 May 2009 02:03:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 6 May 2009 02:03:04 GMT