W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > May 2009

Re: Progress on QRG

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 18:47:00 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20090503.184700.96463652.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: baojie@cs.rpi.edu
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org, ekendall@sandsoft.com, dlm@cs.rpi.edu
From: Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu>
Subject: Re: Progress on QRG
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 16:42:20 -0400

> Thanks
> 
> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:
>> From: Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu>
>> Subject: Progress on QRG
>> Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:45:14 -0400
>>
>>> Hi All
>>
>> [...]

[...]

>>
>>> * In linking xsd datatypes, shall we link to xsd1.0 or xsd 1.1?
>>> (currently only xsd:dateTimeStamp is linked to xsd1.1)
>>
>> xsd 1.1 as that is what we are using.
>>
> Do you mean, e.g., xsd:string should point to
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/#string
> 
> but not
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#string (as it is)

Correct.

peter
Received on Sunday, 3 May 2009 22:46:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:12 UTC