W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > March 2009

Re: Quick comments on the QRG

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:36:31 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20090330.193631.235668316.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: dlm@ksl.stanford.edu
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
All of my current comments are in my preliminary review of QRG - follow
this email thread back to my review message or follow the link on the WG
Reviewing page (http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Reviewing) or see

As I said, some of the suggestions need considerable change to the
document.  These will need another round of reviewing.

I agree with Bijan that a LC publication of the document should include
the compact layout version of the document.


From: "Deborah L. McGuinness" <dlm@ksl.stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: Quick comments on the QRG
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:56:55 -0400

> Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>> My review comments on the QRG guide will require quite extensive changes
>> for it to be suitable for LC status.  I worry about the changes being
>> made in time for a re-review in time for publication on 15 April.
>> On the other hand, I don't see any problem with publishing the QRG in an
>> interim form on 15 April, nor do I see any particular problem in the QRG
>> going to LC status a bit later, and then catching up with the core
>> documents, particularly as QRG will not need a CR phase.
>> peter
> I would like QRG to be published along the same schedule with the other
> documents so at worst, i would like to see an interim publication form
> if we are not in a position to publish the final form.  I would prefer
> not to have the quick ref go later to last call then the other documents
> if we can avoid it.
> We are integrating the other comments now. can we have some of your
> comments now if we can not get all of them now?
> thanks,
> Deborah
Received on Monday, 30 March 2009 23:34:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:10 UTC