Hmm, for OWL QL it says: > it is particularly suitable for applications where relatively > lightweight ontologies are used to organize large numbers of > individuals whereas for OWL RL it says > it is particularly suitable for applications where relatively > lightweight ontologies are used to organize large numbers of > individuals this strikes me as not the most helpful way to get users to understand what is going on -- each of these is followed by an "or" clause - maybe that should be an "and"? -JH On Mar 27, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote: > > It's now at: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/ > > Sorry that took so long. I've announced it to the usual w3.org lists > [1]. I don't think it's that important to get wide review on this > release, so I suggest people judge on a case-by-case basis where to > announce it, based on their sense of audience interest. > > -- Sandro > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2009Mar/0173.html > "Con un poco de semántica ya se consigue ir muy lejos" Prof James Hendler http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~hendler, @jahendler, twitter Tetherless World Constellation Chair Computer Science Dept Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY 12180Received on Friday, 27 March 2009 16:33:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 March 2009 16:33:07 GMT