Some of the LC comments complained (rightly) about our rather careless/inconsistent use of various names (in particular OWL 2, OWL 2 DL and OWL 2 Full). There was an extensive discussion about this at the last F2F and we agreed a strategy. Although this was to some extent captured in the new Document Overview, follow up discussions have suggested that additional clarity/explication, at least amongst ourselves, would be useful. I have therefore documented what I believe to be the agreed naming scheme at [1]. The candidate LC documents have all been checked, and are consistent with this scheme (modulo some minor changes to Document Overview). I also put an item on this week's agenda to discuss this and make sure that we are all on the same page. Ian [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/NamingReceived on Tuesday, 24 March 2009 16:10:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 24 March 2009 16:10:30 GMT