W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > March 2009

Re: ambiguity in XML Schema

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:34:14 +0000
Cc: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <2FE8390C-2C9C-4708-B5E9-D7750CB55270@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
On 17 Mar 2009, at 12:31, Sandro Hawke wrote:
[snip]
> I don't disagree with any of that.
>
> I suggest we leave it at this: if someone sees a place where they
> believe folks could reasonably mis-understand XML Schema (with respect
> to OWL), they should propose one or more test cases to clarify the
> matter.  *If* we end up approving some test cases like that, then  
> we'll
> consider whether some clarifying text is needed somewhere (in our  
> specs
> or in XML schema specs.)

As we should for all our specs :)

> Good enough?

Indeed, but, as I say, not really XML Schema specific.

Cheers,
Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2009 12:34:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 17 March 2009 12:34:48 GMT