On 17 Mar 2009, at 12:31, Sandro Hawke wrote: [snip] > I don't disagree with any of that. > > I suggest we leave it at this: if someone sees a place where they > believe folks could reasonably mis-understand XML Schema (with respect > to OWL), they should propose one or more test cases to clarify the > matter. *If* we end up approving some test cases like that, then > we'll > consider whether some clarifying text is needed somewhere (in our > specs > or in XML schema specs.) As we should for all our specs :) > Good enough? Indeed, but, as I say, not really XML Schema specific. Cheers, Bijan.Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2009 12:34:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 17 March 2009 12:34:48 GMT