Re: Datatype disjointness implemented

Hi Boris,

You wrote;

> Thus, even if someone might thing that the definitions from XML Schema are odd
> or broken, the brokenness is not in our court, and we have undertaken measures
> to fix it (via examples). Should anyone think that this brokenness absolutely
> must be corrected, probably the best course of action would be to submit a LC
> comment to the XML Schema WG.

I disagree. Broken is broken and I think this brokenness absolutely
must be corrected. If you think that we should work this out with the
XML Schema group, that may be an option, but it's may be better to not
add a dependency on an issue that we're not certain we can resolve and
instead fix it so that it's not  broken in OWL.

-Alan