Re: draft response to LC 58 concerning OWL Full [RE: FYI - unresolved LC Comments]

I added the paragraph because I thought that we had discussed (at the  
F2F) explaining more fully in the response the reasons why we decided  
to make this change. Anyway, as far as I am concerned this paragraph  
can certainly be deleted.

Ian


On 12 Mar 2009, at 15:09, Michael Schneider wrote:

> Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>
>> 58  Strong typing of FS		11 Mar Remove paragraph on Full
> (TODO)
>
> Yes, I think the text concerning OWL Full
>
> <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC_Responses/MH1>
> """
> there will also be an important benefit
> in allowing OWL structures (i.e., the UML diagrams)
> to also capture most OWL Full ontologies
> [...]
> """
>
> should be removed. It answers a question that has not been asked by  
> the
> commenter.
>
> Michael
>
> --
> Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider
> Research Scientist, Dept. Information Process Engineering (IPE)
> Tel  : +49-721-9654-726
> Fax  : +49-721-9654-727
> Email: michael.schneider@fzi.de
> WWW  : http://www.fzi.de/michael.schneider
> ====================================================================== 
> =
> FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe
> Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe
> Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959
> Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts, Az 14-0563.1, RP Karlsruhe
> Vorstand: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Rüdiger Dillmann, Dipl. Wi.-Ing. Michael  
> Flor,
> Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Wolffried Stucky, Prof. Dr. Rudi Studer
> Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus
> ====================================================================== 
> =
>

Received on Sunday, 15 March 2009 19:36:54 UTC