- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:17:39 -0400
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Similar comment to the one on QL, for RL. Current: "OWL 2 RL enables the implementation of polynomial time reasoning algorithms using rule-extended database technologies operating directly on RDF triples; it is particularly suitable for applications where relatively lightweight ontologies are used with very large datasets, and where it is useful or necessary to operate directly on data in the form of RDF triples." Is it equally true that in RL there is benefit to a small tbox and large abox? I was under the impression that they were more on equal footing in RL. Suggested rephrasing is: "OWL 2 RL enables the implementation of polynomial time reasoning algorithms using rule-extended database technologies operating directly on RDF triples; it is particularly suitable for applications that want to manage relatively large amounts of data represented using OWL, and where it is useful or necessary to operate directly on that data in the form of RDF triples." -Alan
Received on Wednesday, 11 March 2009 16:18:16 UTC