> On 11 Mar 2009, at 14:48, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > [snip] > > However, the Venn diagram is, to my mind, a prime example of > > "gratuitous > > graphics" - graphics that don't add any information and only detract > > from the message. However, the detraction is not enough to make me > > scream. > > > I think it provokes questions we don't want asked, like "so, what > *is* the intersection of them all! why isn't *that* named?!?" > > Let's avoid that, if we can. More of the story.... My first/larger version... http://www.w3.org/People/Sandro/owl2-profiles-doc was aimed at answering that question. I was/am hoping to let people click on any area and see which features are available. I imagine this diagram would go into Profiles, and producing it is just some mechanical work on stuff that's already in there. I thought maybe the smaller version in Overview might link to the bigger version in Profiles, when it's ready. In other words, I think people will ask the question anyway, and I'd like to have an answer ready. -- SandroReceived on Wednesday, 11 March 2009 15:23:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 11 March 2009 15:23:42 GMT