- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 19:06:16 +0000
- To: Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Looks good to me. Thanks, Ian On 24 Feb 2009, at 14:31, Uli Sattler wrote: > Hi, here is a revised draft response to LC comment 46. Cheers, Uli > > ----------- > > Dear Jan, > > thank you for your comment > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/ > 0050.html on > the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts. > > You have noticed that, in the current specification of OWL 2, only > *unary* datatype relatations (facets) are supported and that, in > theory, this restriction is unnecessary. The syntax is defined, > however, in such a way that it can be easily extended to datatype > relatations (facets) of arity larger than one. It is possible that > such an extension (to the syntax and the semantics) will be > published later as a separate document; this will depend on the > state of and experiences with implementations. > > Please acknowledge receipt of this email to public-owl- > comments@w3.org (replying to this email should suffice). In your > acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied > with the working group's response to your comment. > > Regards, > Uli Sattler > on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/N-ary_Data_predicate_proposal > > >
Received on Monday, 2 March 2009 19:06:55 UTC