Sandro Hawke wrote: >> But I found several general issues, the first being >> particularly important: >> >> 1. Schedule >> ----------- >> >> I don't understand why the "Status of the Document" >> tells: >> >> "Please Comment By 30 July 2009" >> >> How can we then keep our time line as defined in >> >> <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Timeline> >> >> According to this timeline, we plan want to publish >> our spec as PR on 1st of August, i.e. the day after >> the comment period ends! > > I just left the duration constant (7 weeks), as the publication date > slipped. I can reduce it a little, but July 15 strikes me as very > short. Are the implementors comfortable with being all done and with > all comments made by July 15? Is July 30 better? > > I think that is wise. With publication on the 15th of June I think that one month is awfully short for the implementers. Remember that some of the implementers may come from the 'outside', ie, not WG members, they will need some time to digest things... Ie, I think 30 July is indeed better. Ivan -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 June 2009 08:30:34 GMT