On 30 Jul 2009, at 22:51, Bijan Parsia wrote: > On 30 Jul 2009, at 21:54, Michael Schneider wrote: > [snip] [snip] > > 1) Manual inspect (not hugely unreasonable, actually) > 2) Report it as an annoying serialization bug (not becuase it doesnt > conform, but because it's uboptimal) > 3) Do a structural equivalence test. You *could*, maybe, augment 1 with a mutual entailment check, I guess. But it's hard to imagine good tests where that was really necessary (except maybe a tough brainbender...) and it's a dangerous habit to get into. Cheers, Bijan.Received on Thursday, 30 July 2009 21:39:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 30 July 2009 21:39:47 GMT