Re: need a list of systems parsing OWL2 RDF/XML

Hmm.  Agreed.  The test harness does indeed relieve the systems of doing
their own parsing.  Nonetheless, HermiT and Pellet, at least, can indeed
input OWL 2 DL ontologies in both RDF/XML and FS (or so I have been
told).

peter


From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Subject: Re: need a list of systems parsing OWL2 RDF/XML 
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:51:15 -0500

>> Looking at the test results, it appears that there are a number of
>> systems that are passing test cases and thus must be doing parsing.
> 
> Pointer?
> 
> Last I heard (and of course I may have missed something), Mike Smith was
> doing all the testing, using an OWLAPI to drive reasoners.  That setup
> obviously does not address my concern.
> 
>      -- Sandro
> 
>> peter
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
>> Subject: need a list of systems parsing OWL2 RDF/XML
>> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:54:04 -0500
>> 
>> > 
>> > Are there any systems which parse all the the OWL2 test cases, and claim
>> > to parse all OWL 2 ontologies (from the RDF/XML syntax)?  I expect
>> > OWLAPI can do the parsing; I don't know if the existing "1.1" code is
>> > complete, though, or when "version 3" will be out.  And even if it's
>> > perfect, we still need another one....
>> > 
>> > I asked this whimsically a few days ago, and I haven't heard any systems
>> > named yet.  It is a serious question; I don't think we can exit CR if
>> > all the passing systems use the same library for parsing (since it
>> > doesn't show multiple implementations of the mapping-to-rdf spec).
>> > 
>> >     -- Sandro
>> >

Received on Wednesday, 29 July 2009 18:09:42 UTC