W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > July 2009

Re: bug in (approved) test case (syntax)

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:17:23 -0400
Message-ID: <29af5e2d0907261217h5587151v25bd144be0c64e68@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
You are looking at the (advertised) buggy output of the current OWL
API. The normative RDF/XML for these tests are on pages pointed to on
the wiki page:
http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/projects/owltests/index.php/New-Feature-ObjectQCR-001-RDFXML

These validate properly.

-Alan

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Sandro Hawke<sandro@w3.org> wrote:
> Looking at a random test case:
>    http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/projects/owltests/index.php/New-Feature-ObjectQCR-001
>
> I find the provided RDF/XML (attached) isn't well-formed XML.  I expect
> the problem is pervasive.
>
> FWIW, the version in the all.rdf, which is somewhat different, looks
> okay.  (It's also attached.)  I suppose we're running some bleeding edge
> converter to produce the RDF/XML?
>
>    -- Sandro
>
>
>
Received on Sunday, 26 July 2009 19:18:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 26 July 2009 19:18:24 GMT