W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > July 2009

Re: OWL dot OWL file

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:39:38 -0400
Message-ID: <20090724.083938.208131625.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: <schneid@fzi.de>
CC: <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
I have no major difficulties with such changes, except that every time
something is added - even an rdfs:comment - there is another chance to
have something go wrong.  To me, this argues very strongly for not
adding anything, and perhaps even going back to just including the
typing, domain, and range stuff.

peter



From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
Subject: RE: OWL dot OWL file
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 02:52:07 -0500

> Hi!
> 
> Triggered by a mail of Holger (thanks to Holger for finding the
> "rdf:ObjectProperty" bug!), I have tried to bring the form of owl2.owl a bit
> more in line with the other files rdf.rdf and rdfs.rdfs (no changes to the
> relevant triples). Effects:
> 
> * Slight changes to how the rdfs:commentS are written.
> * rdfs:seeAlso Links for each term.
> * A dc:title for the ontology header
> 
> I have also checked through the comments and refined some of them, and most
> of them look now pretty acceptable to me, but a few seem still discussible.
> 
> One thing that should probably be mentioned: I have extended the comment for
> owl:DataRange by a note that it is deprecated (exactly the same note that is
> used in the RDF-Based Semantics). Is someone unhappy with this? 
> 
> Cheers,
> Michael
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org]
>>On Behalf Of Michael Schneider
>>Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 11:57 AM
>>To: Ian Horrocks
>>Cc: W3C OWL Working Group
>>Subject: RE: OWL dot OWL file
>>
>>Hi!
>>
>>I have created a Wiki page containing my current proposal for owl2.owl
>>(_not_ for the whole set OWL 2 axiomatic triples), so we can better work
>>on
>>it:
>>
>>  <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Owl2DotOwlDevel>
>>
>>There are links to some of the mails so far, and a lot of open
>>questions,
>>and some TODOs.
>>
>>I have copy&pasted the ontology header from owl.owl, and started to
>>update
>>it, but there are several open points. In particular, the header comment
>>probably needs more brains to think about it. For a start, I have
>>included
>>some (not all :)) of Peter's yesterday's comments to it, but please...
>>comment!
>>
>>I have also added labels in the owl.owl style to every term, and even a
>>preliminary rdfs:comment (as recently asked for by Holger), but the
>>comments
>>are in several cases probably not so good yet, maybe even inadequate.
>>Maybe
>>others have a look at them (I will have a look myself, when I have a
>>little
>>more time for this).
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Michael
> 
> --
> Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider
> Research Scientist, Dept. Information Process Engineering (IPE)
> Tel  : +49-721-9654-726
> Fax  : +49-721-9654-727
> Email: michael.schneider@fzi.de
> WWW  : http://www.fzi.de/michael.schneider
> =======================================================================
> FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe
> Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe
> Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959
> Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts, Az 14-0563.1, RP Karlsruhe
> Vorstand: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Rüdiger Dillmann, Dipl. Wi.-Ing. Michael Flor,
> Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Wolffried Stucky, Prof. Dr. Rudi Studer
> Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus
> =======================================================================
> 
Received on Friday, 24 July 2009 12:39:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 24 July 2009 12:39:12 GMT