- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:45:38 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@deri.org>, 'W3C OWL Working Group' <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On 22 Jul 2009, at 20:29, Sandro Hawke wrote: >>> Thanks. Why can't we just edit the file at w3.org? The problem >>> seems very easy to fix. >> >> Hysterical raisons. Basically, wikiexperimentation and I believe we >> decided to wait until the next round to fix this once and for all. > > Let's fix it now. Where should I put the real schema? It doesn't matter to me. Perhaps we should put some boilerplate reminding people to caching/use it locally and not from the web? SchemaLocation sorta sucks for this. You can point to another location, but meh. > I guess it > should be linked from the namespace, somehow, but there's no > standard or > even non-standard vocabulary for doing that, as far as I know > (offhand). HTML? I guess RDDL is out of vogue. > (BTW, have I mentioned how much I regret agreeing to write the XSLT > for > GRDDL'ing OWL/XML? Ugh.) :) I'm still trying to get a Full/DL validator going...in my copious spare time. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Wednesday, 22 July 2009 19:41:24 UTC