Possibly wrong use of RL-theorem in the Conformance spec

Hi!

In Section 2.3.1 of the Conformance spec, appended to the definition of an "OWL 2 RL entailment checker", there is the following note:

[[
Note that it follows from Theorem PR1 of Profiles [OWL 2 Profiles] 
that it is always safe for an OWL 2 RL entailment checker 
using the RDF-Based Semantics 
to return False if:
... several conditions ...
]]

But the actual theorem PR1 does only make a assertion about the relationship between the RL ruleset and the *Direct Semantics*. Nothing is said about the RDF-Based Semantics by that theorem.

So I believe that in the above note, the term "RDF-Based Semantics" has to be replaced by the term "Direct Semantics".

Michael

--
Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider
Research Scientist, Dept. Information Process Engineering (IPE)
Tel  : +49-721-9654-726
Fax  : +49-721-9654-727
Email: michael.schneider@fzi.de
WWW  : http://www.fzi.de/michael.schneider
=======================================================================
FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe
Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe
Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959
Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts, Az 14-0563.1, RP Karlsruhe
Vorstand: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Rüdiger Dillmann, Dipl. Wi.-Ing. Michael Flor,
Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Wolffried Stucky, Prof. Dr. Rudi Studer
Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus
=======================================================================