W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > January 2009

Re: Agenda TC 21/01/2009

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:32:48 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20090128.123248.143463617.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: hector.perez-urbina@comlab.ox.ac.uk
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org

The agenda has some glitches:

- last week was 21 January, not 14 January
- several actions have had status changes

peter


From: Héctor Pérez-Urbina <hector.perez-urbina@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Subject: Agenda TC 21/01/2009
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:05:04 +0000

> 
> Hi,
> 
> This is a preliminary version of this week's TC:
> 
>     *  Admin
>           o Roll call
>           o Agenda amendments?
>           o PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes (14 January)
>           o Action items status
>                 + Pending Review Actions
>                       # Action 263 Send an email to clarify how to
> make and deal with WG comments on LC documents / Ian Horrocks
>                 + Due and overdue Actions
>                       # Action 247 Make a detailed proposal for edits
> to ManchesterSyntax to address issue-146 / Alan Ruttenberg
>                       # Action 264 Talk to Tim Redmond about his lc
> comment / Alan Ruttenberg
>           o Soliciting reviews of and/or comments on LC documents
>           o F2F5 (23-24 February, 2009)
>                 + Please add attendance status to People page
>     * Last Call Comments (see public-owl-comments and Responses to
> Last Call Comments)
>           o Dealing with "internal" (LC) comments
>           o Review current comments
>           o rdf:text status from Jie
>           o Do we need extend LC period a bit?
>     * Test Cases
>           o Problems with approved test cases?
>           o PROPOSED: Approve some/all of the test cases currently in
> the test queue
>           o "eye ball tests" wait and see if we can get some tool
> support soon for 'species validation'
>           o How to organize related tests - e.g. same input but
> different results for DL versus Full/RL (e.g. punning/sameas)
>     * Plans for non-LC documents
>     * Coordination with RIF
>           o Organization
>           o LC comments on rdf:text
>           o Datatypes - Sandro update
>     * Features "At-Risk" (just a reminder)
>           o owl:rational support
>           o xsd:decimal precision
>           o owl:dateTime name
>           o rdf:XMLLiteral support
>           o OWL 2 RL Datatypes
>     * Additional other business
>     * RDF Semantics
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Héctor
> 
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2009 17:30:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 28 January 2009 17:30:38 GMT