W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > January 2009

Ontology header is a requirement - inconsistent with resolution of ISSUE-135?

From: Mike Smith <msmith@clarkparsia.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:12:56 -0500
Message-ID: <42485a40901270912i3b348237yfe8fb83c5cc4dc7d@mail.gmail.com>
To: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

>From Sec 3.1.2 of the RDF Mapping Document [1],

"Next, the ontology header is extracted from G by matching patterns
from Table 4 to G. It MUST be possible to match exactly one such
pattern to G in exactly one way."

I believe this requirement is stronger than those present in the
previous OWL standard (based on the tests such as [I5.2-001] ).

It also seems to be inconsistent with the resolution of [ISSUE-135]
(Peter's change is no longer in the document).  Is this intentional?
If so, can someone point me to emails or minutes where the resolution
was changed so I can understand better before commenting?

Mike Smith

Clark & Parsia

[1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Mapping_to_RDF_Graphs#Parsing_of_the_Ontology_Header_and_Declarations
[I5.2-001] http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/projects/owltests/index.php/TestCase:WebOnt-I5.2-001
[ISSUE-135] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/135
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2009 17:13:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:08 UTC