W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > January 2009

Re: A minor bug in OWL 2 RL - Theorem PR1

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:02:06 +0000
Message-Id: <E2A7BE88-1457-4521-A398-CF22263EAADE@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
To: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>


That seems fine to me.

I also think this is legitimately a bug and not a design change. So, I  
think there's no trouble in treating it as editorial...is there?

Cheers,
Bijan.

Received on Monday, 19 January 2009 23:02:42 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ivan Herman: "Re: A minor bug in OWL 2 RL - Theorem PR1"
Previous message: Michael Schneider: "RE: missing(?) RFC2119 statement in Direct Semantics"
In reply to: Boris Motik: "A minor bug in OWL 2 RL - Theorem PR1"
Next in thread: Ivan Herman: "Re: A minor bug in OWL 2 RL - Theorem PR1"
Reply: Ivan Herman: "Re: A minor bug in OWL 2 RL - Theorem PR1"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 19 January 2009 23:02:45 GMT