W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > January 2009

Re: ACTION-261 (change owl:dateTime to xsd:dateTimeStamp)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:36:53 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20090107.153653.167345113.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: schneid@fzi.de
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org

From: "Michael Schneider" <schneid@fzi.de>
Subject: RE: ACTION-261 (change owl:dateTime to xsd:dateTimeStamp)
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 21:30:17 +0100

> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org]
> >On Behalf Of Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> >Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 8:34 PM
> >To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
> >Subject: ACTION-261 (change owl:dateTime to xsd:dateTimeStamp)
> >
> >
> >I've changed syntax to use xsd:dateTimeStamp.
> >
> >I've left in the "at-risk" box.  I've also left in the description of
> >the datatype.  This description would be removed if XSD becomes LC in
> >time for us (and a note added to the post-LC appendix).
> >
> >As far as I can tell, the only other documents that refer to
> >owl:dateTime are RDF Semantics and Profiles.  I think that they only
> >need to change the name.
> 
> Yes, thanks! I have updated the RDF-Based Semantics.
> 
> I found a small typo in the AtRisk note: It starts by
> 
>   "The name last-call datatype ''owl:dateTime''"
>        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> I guess that either "name" or "last-call datatype" should be removed?

Yes.  I've fixed it.

> A question: What about the facet "explicitTimezone", which was
> mentioned in your original mail on this topic? Is this relevant for
> OWL 2? 

Not relevant.  XML Schema uses it but OWL doesn't need to reference it,
as OWL only references xsd:dateTimeStamp.

> Cheers,
> Michael

peter
Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2009 20:35:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 January 2009 20:35:54 GMT