W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > January 2009

Re: WebOnt DL Test Cases ready

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:12:05 +0000
Message-Id: <B5CA0D35-9EA3-4C4B-91B0-93894A996FFE@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: "W3C OWL Working Group" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: Mike Smith <msmith@clarkparsia.com>

Great work -- thanks!

In the case where one or more reasoner fails the test it would be  
useful to explicitly ask the relevant implementers if they can  
explain and/or fix their implementations -- this should improve both  
our confidence in the tests and quality of implementation.

I'm not sure what we should do with those few tests that none of the  
reasoners can handle (correctly) -- I could imagine an argument for  
leaving these out of the test suite, or at least having a separate  
category for such tests as we presumably aren't able to even  
guarantee what the expected result should be.

Ian




On 5 Jan 2009, at 22:10, Mike Smith wrote:

>
> I've updated [1] to contain nearly all of the WebOnt-description-logic
> test cases, along with results of test runs on several DL reasoners
> and propose them for adoption.  With the exception of 7 test cases
> which have display or export problems (for now in the list at [2]),
> this means that all "Additional Description Logic Tests" from the OWL
> tests cases [3] are ready for approval.
>
> -- 
> Mike Smith
>
> Clark & Parsia
> http://clarkparsia.com/
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Test_Queue
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/ 
> User:MikeSmith#Test_Cases_With_Problems
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test/#dL
>
Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2009 17:12:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 January 2009 17:12:44 GMT