Re: Other GRDDL concerns which should not be lost

To be clear, I'm not going back from the point we reached at the F2F.  
I am compromising (will little, if anything, in return). I am beaten  
down.

I think the minimum security measure we could take is to  
cryptographically sign any downloadable transform. I don't know if  
that will interfere with execution or not (needs investigation, but  
not by me). I do know that extant GRDDL agents don't check that. But  
at least they could be upgraded.

As for system concerns...well, I guess if the W3C doesn't care, then  
I'll shut up.

Cheers,
Bijan.