- From: Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:31:08 +0000
- To: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Hi, here is a revised draft response to LC comment 46. Cheers, Uli ----------- Dear Jan, thank you for your comment http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/0050.html on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts. You have noticed that, in the current specification of OWL 2, only *unary* datatype relatations (facets) are supported and that, in theory, this restriction is unnecessary. The syntax is defined, however, in such a way that it can be easily extended to datatype relatations (facets) of arity larger than one. It is possible that such an extension (to the syntax and the semantics) will be published later as a separate document; this will depend on the state of and experiences with implementations. Please acknowledge receipt of this email to public-owl-comments@w3.org (replying to this email should suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment. Regards, Uli Sattler on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/N-ary_Data_predicate_proposal
Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2009 14:31:45 UTC