W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Draft response to LC comment 45

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:14:16 +0000
Message-Id: <75789337-74B9-4286-BDC1-1617F10E15A2@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: sattler@cs.man.ac.uk, public-owl-wg@w3.org
To: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
The table was pretty confusing because it was using ML1 in twice --  
one for Maurizio and one for Marco. I fixed that, and added ML2 for  
this comment and response.

Ian


On 19 Feb 2009, at 19:28, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

> With the fix (to 0048, by the way), this response looks fine.
>
> It should be put on the appropriate Wiki page and the LC responses  
> page
> updated to "Response drafted".
>
> peter
>
>
> From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Draft response to LC comment 45
> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:12:02 -0500
>
>> Hi Uli,
>>
>> The pointer to the comment isn't for this response. The message
>> pointed to is about n-ary.
>> -Alan
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Uli Sattler  
>> <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote:
>>> Hi, here is a draft response  to LC comment 45. Cheers, Uli
>>>
>>> -----------
>>>
>>> Dear Marko,
>>>
>>> thank you for your comment
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/ 
>>> 0050.html on
>>> the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
>>>
>>> We acknowledge the importance of implementations and tool support  
>>> and,
>>> indeed, implementations supporting OWL 2 will be a condition for the
>>> standardization of OWL 2. It is, however, not in the scope of  
>>> this working
>>> group to standardize communications protocols [1].
>>>
>>> On the other hand, we will publish a document of test cases [2]  
>>> and would
>>> welcome help in the generation and testing of these cases. So, if  
>>> you think
>>> that OWLlink would be a suitable tool for testing our test cases,  
>>> then it
>>> would be great if you could coordinate with the working group,  
>>> for example
>>> Markus Kroetzsch and Mike Smith.
>>>
>>> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to public-owl- 
>>> comments@w3.org
>>> (replying to this email should suffice). In your acknowledgment  
>>> please let
>>> us know whether or not you are satisfied  with the working  
>>> group's response
>>> to your comment.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Uli Sattler
>>> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/06/OWLCharter.html
>>> [2]
>>> http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/projects/owltests/index.php/ 
>>> OWL_2_Test_Cases
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Received on Friday, 20 February 2009 15:14:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 20 February 2009 15:14:56 GMT