W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > February 2009

Re: TR1

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:44:50 +0000
Message-Id: <31226538-83CA-42F0-888E-E9F12C1CE086@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Wouldn't it be useful to send the response by way of documentation?  
Presumably he would now be happy with the response, and it would be  
more transparent that asking him to withdraw an the basis of  
conversations that interested parties would then have to dig around  
to find.


On 17 Feb 2009, at 23:07, Bijan Parsia wrote:

> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC_Responses/TR1
> Given where the discussion with Tim ended up, perhaps we should  
> have a shorter reply? Or perhaps just ask him to withdraw the  
> comment? I really like the last. All he would need to do is write  
> to public-owl-comments saying, "After fruitful discussions with  
> members of the working group on this issue, I hereby withdraw my LC  
> comment."
> Cheers,
> Bijan.
Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2009 09:45:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:09 UTC