W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Comments on NF&R

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:56:15 +0000
Cc: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <758C2FF7-117D-49DC-8CAB-B2B940E07583@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
To: Christine Golbreich <cgolbrei@gmail.com>

On 9 Feb 2009, at 20:19, Christine Golbreich wrote:

> I have completed my action to create a Wiki page for NF&R comments  
> [1], mixed or not with LC comments.
> Currently I have addressed all changes asked on NF&R by external  
> comments. Still pending UC#3 (internal) and 4-6-10 (waiting to align  
> on LC responses).
>
> BTW JH1 query for more documentation on hasKey feature is already  
> done in NF&R.

Not to sound like a broken record, but if:
	http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/New_Features_and_Rationale#F9:_Key
is the text, it still fails to address the specifics of Jim's comment.

It also doesn't address the rationale for non-functionality.

I note that it's quite a mess too, with repetition and a lot of  
emphasis on stating *what* the features are rather than explaining  
*why* they are

It needs a major rewrite and from someone who understands the  
rationale. I volunteer, but not right now. It's hardly pressing as  
this document is not in LC.

I still have many concerns with the document duplicating text from  
other documents (e.g., the grammar productions). It would be nice if  
we would discuss it at some point. I'm happy for there to be an issue.

Cheers,
BIjan.
Received on Monday, 9 February 2009 20:56:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 9 February 2009 20:56:50 GMT