W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > February 2009

Re: XML Schema 1.1 LCWD

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 12:42:29 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20090209.124229.10450482.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: sandro@w3.org
Cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org, public-owl-wg@w3.org

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Subject: XML Schema 1.1 LCWD
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 12:21:48 -0500

> I hadn't noticed until today that XML Schema 1.1 was currently in Last
> Call. 

I wonder why we didn't get an explicit heads-up.  

> I think both RIF and OWL ought to review at least 
> 
>     W3C XML Schema Definition Language (XSD) 1.1 Part 2: Datatypes
>     http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/
> 
> to make sure they say what we want them to say.  For instance, it
> includes this change:
> 
>      At the suggestion of the W3C OWL Working Group, a explicitTimezone
>      facet has been added to allow date/time datatypes to be restricted
>      by requiring or forbidding an explicit time zone offset from UTC,
>      instead of making it optional. The dateTimeStamp datatype has been
>      defined using this facet.

This is as expected and I believe that it is fine for us.

The OWL WG should probably send in a LC comment to the effect that we
are happy with this.

> The draft says the comment deadline is Feb 20, but it was just extended
> to March 2 [1].
> 
>      -- Sandro
> 
> [1] W3C member-access e-mail
>     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2009JanMar/0031.html
> 


peter
Received on Monday, 9 February 2009 17:42:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 9 February 2009 17:42:20 GMT