>From: Bijan Parsia [mailto:bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk] >You misunderstand me. The point is that RDF "the language" isn't >necessarily fixed. There might be new versions, just as their might >be new version of Unicode. The issue is whether your document should >normatively reference a *particular* version or normatively reference >the current "and any future one". Ah, sorry, really a misunderstanding on my side. >> But as I said, I have no problem with adding the additional >> information. >> Just let's have a common policy, in order to reduce creativity. :) > >Obviously, that's what I'm trying to do. > >But sometimes it may make sense to refer to a fixed version in one >document and not in another. For example, allowing any future version >of XML be a legal OWL/XML syntax is probably ok. Claiming that your >semantics is an extension of *any future* RDF semantics probably isn't. It's definitely an extension of that particular RDF Semantics specification. It's impossible to foresee the future, and there may be a lot of new things and changes in an RDF 2 spec that may then be in conflict with current OWL 2 Full. Same for RDF Concepts. >Cheers, >Bijan. Cheers, Michael -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider Research Scientist, Dept. Information Process Engineering (IPE) Tel : +49-721-9654-726 Fax : +49-721-9654-727 Email: schneid@fzi.de WWW : http://www.fzi.de/ipe/eng/mitarbeiter.php?id=555 ============================================================================ == FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959 Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Stiftung Az: 14-0563.1 Regierungspräsidium Karlsruhe Vorstand: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Rüdiger Dillmann, Dipl. Wi.-Ing. Michael Flor, Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Dr. h.c. Wolffried Stucky, Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Rudi Studer Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus ============================================================================ ==
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 5 February 2009 12:17:01 GMT