W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > August 2009

Agenda TC 05/08/2009

From: Héctor Pérez-Urbina <hector.perez-urbina@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:22:46 +0100
Message-ID: <cbb4a7610908040922u32b26769o8c3ecc8f358b3812@mail.gmail.com>
To: "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

This is a preliminary version of this week's teleconference:

   1.  Admin
          * Roll call
          * Agenda amendments?
          * PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes (15 July)
          * Action items status
                o Pending Review Actions
                      + Action 344 Clarity the description of datatype
maps in Syntax and Conformance / Boris Motik
                      + Action 347 Change the status on these 84 tests
from Proposed to Approved, with a reference to the minutes / Michael
                      + Action 348 Ask owlapi devs about species
validation / Ian Horrocks
                o Due and overdue Actions
                      + Action 331 About 1 month out to do
accessibility audit / Bijan Parsia
                      + Action 345 Push along the accessibility audit
of our documents / Ian Horrocks
                      + Action 346 Ping Bijan or somebody else for
solution to ACTION-331 (accessibility audit) / Ian Horrocks
   2. Issues/comments
          * Holger Knublauch's LC Comment -- request for OWL 2 vocabulary file
          * Gioele Barabucci's LC Comment -- explain profile acronyms
and relationship between profiles
          * Jeff Heflin's LC Comment -- imports, deprication, profiles
and arithmetic
          * Dan Connolly's LC Comment -- MIME type registration
          * Fix error in RDF-Based Semantics as per Michael Schneider's email
          * Antoine Zimmermann's suggestion to add clarifying note(s)
on asymmetric properties
          * Michael Schneider's suggestion to modify OWL 2 RL/RDF rules
          * Other issues?
   3. Features "At-Risk"
          * PROPOSED: implementation support for owl:rational has been
adequately demonstrated and the feature is no longer considered
          * PROPOSED: implementation support for rdf:XMLLiteral
support has been adequately demonstrated and the feature is no longer
considered at-risk
   4. Advancing documents to Working Group Note and Proposed
Recommendation status
          * CR Exit Criteria and Implementation Report
          * PROPOSED: rdf:PlainLiteral is ready for publication as a
Proposed Recommendation
          * PROPOSED: Document Overview, Structural Specification and
Functional-Style Syntax, Mapping to RDF Graphs, Direct Semantics,
RDF-Based Semantics, Conformance, Profiles, Primer, New Features and
Rationale, Quick Reference Guide and XML Serialization are ready for
publication as Proposed Recommendations
   5. Implementation and Test Cases
   6. Additional other business


Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:23:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:13 UTC