W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > August 2009

Re: CR comments

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:28:29 +0100
Message-Id: <C78BC1A3-BF7A-4DE2-BADE-893B1B37F29C@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
On 4 Aug 2009, at 11:50, Ian Horrocks wrote:

This line seems to be incorrect:

"""Regarding imports, the direct semantics operates on ontology  
structures; it therefore has nothing to say about importation, which  
operates on ontology documents."""

Importation exists in ontology structures (see <http://www.w3.org/ 
"""Apart from axioms, ontologies can also contain ontology  
annotations (as described in more detail in Section 3.5), and they  
can also import other ontologies (as described in Section 3.4).""")

But we can respond more directly to what he wrote:

"""I find it strange that imports is not mentioned at all in the Direct
Semantics. I think it should be explicit that the semantics should be
applied to the axiom closure of the ontology. """


""Actually, you can see from:
(An interpretation I satisfies an OWL 2 ontology O if all axioms in  
the axiom closure of O (with anonymous individuals standardized apart  
as described in Section 5.6.2 of the OWL 2 Specification [OWL 2  
Specification]) are satisfied in I w.r.t. O.)
that the direct semantics of OWL ontologies is explicitly applied to  
the axiom closure (with at link back to the definition of axiom  

Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 14:24:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:13 UTC