W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2009

Re: A note on "non" and "non-"

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:01:25 +0100
Message-Id: <D12C27F8-1CCB-49B9-8A91-F8AC8E70001E@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: "Boris Motik" <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, "'Antoine Zimmermann'" <antoine.zimmermann@deri.org>, "'W3C OWL Working Group'" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
On 22 Apr 2009, at 13:13, Sandro Hawke wrote:

>> Oh, I see. This text does not appear in the Wiki and has indeed been
>> added when document snapshots were generated. Not much I can do
>> there. Thanks for this observation -- we'll keep this in mind during
>> the next publication round.
> Yes, that's due to me.  Pubrules uses the hyphen [1], and I suspect  
> the
> pubrules checker requires it.
> I've forwarded your argument against it to the appropriate W3C staff
> person, and I'll report back on the answer.

We clearly need a longer discussion on this...perhaps some telecon  
time...or even a special F2F[1]!!!!


[1] or maybe a F-2-F ;)

P.S. For a famous attack on the hyphen see: http://www-cs- 
faculty.stanford.edu/~knuth/email.html ... I always forget that  
software used to be hypenated!
Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2009 12:57:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:12 UTC