W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2009

Re: "at risk"

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:21:13 +0100
Message-Id: <100F7FE5-C1E4-4DDC-BA45-07804644E313@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, OWL 2 <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Peter,

Thanks (again!) for taking care of this.

Ian


On 16 Apr 2009, at 23:28, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

> From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
> Subject: "at risk"
> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:15:48 -0400
>
>>
>>>>> There were 4 At Risks in the 1st last call.  Numbers 2 and 3 are
>>>>> resolved, leaving 1 and 4.  I like leaving the numbering as is.
>>>>
>>>> That makes sense, but I think we should explain that in the  
>>>> SOTD.  Maybe
>>>> a new subheading, like "Features At Risk".  Which documents have  
>>>> At Risk
>>>> statements?
>>>
>>> Syntax, is the base one, with both AR#1 and AR#4.
>>> RDF-Based Semantics mentions AR#1.
>>> Profiles has its own AR - which mentions that there are two AR in  
>>> Syntax.
>>> rdf:text has two separate AR - rtfn:compare and rtfn:length
>>>
>>> I think that is all.
>>>
>>> What text should go where?  Perhaps
>>>
>>> There are two At-Risk features in this last call for OWL 2, both  
>>> having
>>> to do with datatype support.  The datatype owl:rational is at risk
>>> (At-Risk #1) and will be removed if there are not implementations  
>>> that
>>> support it.  The datatype rdf:XMLLiteral is at risk (At-Risk #4)  
>>> in the
>>> functional syntax, and *may* be removed as a result of  
>>> implementation
>>> experience.  Comments during the previous last-call period  
>>> resulted in
>>> the resolution of two previous at-risk features.
>>
>> Can we have a wiki page that enumerates 1-4 with a brief  
>> explanation on
>> each one, including saying how 2 and 3 were resolved?  Then the At- 
>> Risk
>> template can link users to that page for more details (including the
>> story of what finally happened to the item....).
>>
>>       -- Sandro
>
> See http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/At_Risk
>
> This information is also in the Changes page.
>
> peter
>
Received on Friday, 17 April 2009 10:21:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 17 April 2009 10:22:00 GMT