W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2009

Re: "at risk"

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:28:44 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20090416.182844.73350613.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: sandro@w3.org
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Subject: "at risk" 
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:15:48 -0400

> 
>> >> There were 4 At Risks in the 1st last call.  Numbers 2 and 3 are
>> >> resolved, leaving 1 and 4.  I like leaving the numbering as is.   
>> > 
>> > That makes sense, but I think we should explain that in the SOTD.  Maybe
>> > a new subheading, like "Features At Risk".  Which documents have At Risk
>> > statements?
>> 
>> Syntax, is the base one, with both AR#1 and AR#4.
>> RDF-Based Semantics mentions AR#1.
>> Profiles has its own AR - which mentions that there are two AR in Syntax.
>> rdf:text has two separate AR - rtfn:compare and rtfn:length
>> 
>> I think that is all.
>> 
>> What text should go where?  Perhaps
>> 
>> There are two At-Risk features in this last call for OWL 2, both having
>> to do with datatype support.  The datatype owl:rational is at risk
>> (At-Risk #1) and will be removed if there are not implementations that
>> support it.  The datatype rdf:XMLLiteral is at risk (At-Risk #4) in the
>> functional syntax, and *may* be removed as a result of implementation
>> experience.  Comments during the previous last-call period resulted in
>> the resolution of two previous at-risk features.
> 
> Can we have a wiki page that enumerates 1-4 with a brief explanation on
> each one, including saying how 2 and 3 were resolved?  Then the At-Risk
> template can link users to that page for more details (including the
> story of what finally happened to the item....).
> 
>       -- Sandro

See http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/At_Risk

This information is also in the Changes page.

peter
Received on Thursday, 16 April 2009 22:29:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 16 April 2009 22:29:30 GMT