W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2009

Re: QRG in pdf

From: Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:48:45 -0400
Message-ID: <b6b357670904150948w1bc38bfeo6f31708615025d40@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christine Golbreich <cgolbrei@gmail.com>
Cc: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, OWL 2 <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Christine

While 2-page layout is not a rigid requirement, I believe a 2-page
(single sheet of paper) guide is much better than a 4-page (two
sheets) guide. It may be easier to print, fold and carry with, and
less intimidating for beginners. I used to laminate the Ubiquity card
(as many commercial reference cards are) and carry it everywhere when
I started learning RDF/OWL. Unless 2-page layout is absolutely
impossible, I would still prefer to have it.

Jie

2009/4/15 Christine Golbreich <cgolbrei@gmail.com>:
> 2009/4/15 Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>:
>> On 15 Apr 2009, at 17:00, Christine Golbreich wrote:
>>
>>> Perhaps did I miss something, may I dare ask why the QRG is strictly
>>> limited to 2 pages in pdf? is that constraint so rigid?
>>
>> I think so. The design goal for the QRG is to produce a reference card a la:
>>        http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/_file_directory_/resources/94.pdf
>
> I remember, does it exclude 2 cards recto verso =  4 pages ?
> and even so, why should we be so rigid ?
>
>> Indeed, it was modeled on that.
>>
>> The Ubiquity card has gotten quite a few downloads (I forget what they
>> said...Elisa?) and serves a nice, distinctive role.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Bijan.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Christine
>



-- 
Jie Bao
http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie

Facebook,Twitter,Skype,Msn,LinkedIn - check url above
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2009 16:49:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 15 April 2009 16:49:25 GMT