Re: elisa's action-321

OK -- I was too hasty -- sorry.

The problem with this is that I think that it is now too late to  
usefully complete the action -- we can hardly expect Christine to  
have time to address further comments -- in fact we are now at the  
HTML/link validation phase!

Ian


On 14 Apr 2009, at 18:08, Sandro Hawke wrote:

>
>>  + Action 321 Review NF&R (perhaps after some
>> editing) / Elisa Kendall
>>
>> Elisa sent her review on 8 April, why is stil still as Due and  
>> overdue Actions?
>> AFAIK, it should be removed from the Agenda.
>
> I objected to closing this last week because Elisa write [1]:
>
>       I've only addressed through section 2, ....  I'll follow up with
>       additional feedback on the remaining sections over the next  
> couple
>       of days, given travel constraints.
>
> Given that, it seemed appropriate to keep the action open until Elisa
> did the rest of what she said she was going to do.
>
>      -- Sandro
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2009Apr/ 
> 0164.html
>

Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 21:31:05 UTC