W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2009

Re: reply to a POWDER Group request

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:21:49 +0100
Message-Id: <171609E6-D9BC-40BB-B518-564DE6786186@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
To: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On 13 Apr 2009, at 21:11, Michael Schneider wrote:
> * The cited reference "[OWL2]" points to the Primer. I believe the  
> Document Overview is the best document to generically refer to OWL 2.

Really? That seems unfortunate.

Or is that a design goal for Overview?

(I would have thought Syntax, but I guess the problem is that it  
doesn't encompass semantics? Anyway.)

Received on Monday, 13 April 2009 20:22:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:11 UTC