W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2009

Re: Datatype (Map) Conformance Strangeness

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:45:46 +0100
Message-Id: <4DB180E3-37AF-49DE-9E67-CA8D7AE858AC@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
To: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On 10 Apr 2009, at 23:41, Ian Horrocks wrote:

> I agree with you that this has got rather confused. I think that the  
> problem is twofold:
>
> 1) I added the (redundant) note about conformant ontology documents  
> in the wrong place -- this could actually be part of the definition  
> of an OWL 2 DL ontology document (it is redundant because the  
> condition is already one of the conditions that an ontology must  
> satisfy in order to be an OWL 2 ontology as specified in Section 3  
> of SS&FS).

/me notes that this sort of thing is one of the problems with  
redundancy.

Avoid it! :)

Cheers,
Bijan.
Received on Friday, 10 April 2009 22:46:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 10 April 2009 22:46:28 GMT