W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2009

Re: Review of XML Serialization (first part)

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:43:59 +0100
Message-Id: <C141ADD4-C126-4188-9B42-F8F1101208B7@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: OWL 2 <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>
On 8 Apr 2009, at 13:21, Rinke Hoekstra wrote:

> Hi,
> I had another look at the XML Serialization,


> and am really happy with the additions and new structure. Much better.


> There are still a couple of things I'd like to remark though:
> * The definition of PN_PREFIX contains an invisible character ' '  
> that probably shouldn't be there.

I looked but couldn't see it!

Do you mean:
(&PN_CHARS; ))?
If so, fixed.

> * The definition of PN_CHARS_BASE is garbled on the wiki, as it (or  
> my firefox?) tries to render the characters. This makes that one  
> cannot copy & paste the XML schema from the browser to a file.

Well, it's not garbled, per se. If you have the right encoding, it  
should be ok. It's just two different spelling.

> Isn't there some way of making this possible (My guess is that it  
> can be done, but that it would interfere with the live-from-wiki  
> schema)

Yes and Yes. Basically I have to escape the amps. I prefer this way  
of rendering since it makes it absolutely clear that it is the same  
as sparql.

Will tweak in the generation process.

I tend to download it from:

I think it would be nice to have a link to a direct download so one  
can do that instead of cnp. I'll add that.

> * I am a bit puzzled by the line "Only one Prefix element may  
> define a prefix in a particular file" as the schema clearly allows  
> for multiple prefixes to be defined. Perhaps turn the sentence  
> 'round to "In any particular file, a prefix may be defined by only  
> one Prefix element".

Much better, thanks! Fixed.

Schema updated.

Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 14:40:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:11 UTC