W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2009

Re: Agenda TC 08/04/2009

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 18:01:25 +0100
Message-Id: <AA525DF3-FA08-40D6-9363-D1E0D3F94B16@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>, "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
On 7 Apr 2009, at 17:48, Ian Horrocks wrote:

> On 7 Apr 2009, at 17:45, Michael Schneider wrote:
>
>>>          * PROPOSED: WG will send short CR comment to HTML WG of the
>>> form "we looked at your spec but came to the conclusion that it did
>>> not meet our requirements"
>>
>> April Fool, or did I overlook something? :)
>
> Not sure -- this is about CURIEs (the proposal could have been  
> clearer on that point!)

"We looked at the CURIE spec but came to the conclusion that we won't  
use it."

Cheers,
Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 16:57:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 7 April 2009 16:57:39 GMT