On 2 Apr 2009, at 13:38, Sandro Hawke wrote: > >>> Remove EdNote on GRDDL. >> >> I did that, because AFAIK we did decide exactly what to do about >> GRDDL (see http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/97). It was >> subsequently determined that we can have multiple transforms, and >> also that Sandro will develop a suitable XSLT (with some technical >> help from Bijan). Others may have a different view? > > While that's all true, we did agree (although not "resolve") in a > telecon to add that note AFTER we had closed the issue and settled on > our current course of action. Really? That's not my recollection. > I think it was Bijan who was arguing for > this ednote, though, so if he doesn't have a problem with removing it, > then... okay. Nuke it. Cheers, Bijan.Received on Thursday, 2 April 2009 13:20:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 2 April 2009 13:20:34 GMT