Here is my review of the Profiles specification: Overall comments: Despite some minor concerns listed below, the spec is ready to go. Detailed comments: Section 1: Introduction. The last paragraph of the introduction says 'This document depends on the four features identified in the OWL 2 Specification [pointer to the syntax spec] as being at risk'. However, I could only find two features at risk in the Syntax Spec (Feature at risk #1 owl:rational support and Feature at risk #4: rdf:XMLLiteral support, which should probably be numbered 2) Section 4.1: OWL 2 RL Feature overview. NegativeObjectPropertyAssertion and NegativeDataPropertyAssertion are disallowed, but it seems that they should be part of the language since they can be expressed using other allowed constructs (e.g. NegativeObjectPropertyAssertion(R, a, b) = DisjointClasses(ObjectSomeValueFrom(R, ObjectOneOf(b)), ObjectOneOf(a))). Section 4.2.5 OWL 2 RL Axioms DataPropertyDomain is incorrectly defined as DataPropertyDomain := 'DataPropertyDomain' '(' axiomAnnotations DataPropertyExpression superClassExpression ')'. superClassExpression in the previous definition should be replaced by DataRange. Best regards, Achille.Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2009 20:28:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 April 2009 20:28:38 GMT