W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > September 2008

Re: Quick reference guide status update

From: Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:19:46 -0400
Message-ID: <b6b357670809240919l6e882e8cq421349b867ae230e@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Rinke Hoekstra" <hoekstra@uva.nl>
Cc: "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, "W3C OWL Working Group" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl> wrote:
>
> Hi Jie,
>
> I had a quick scan of the quick ref guide, and have two comments:
> * 'constructs in shadow are available in OWL 2'... shouldn't that be *only*
> available in OWL 2?
Will add "only"

> * I don't understand why deprecated elements from OWL 1 are included, and
> even displayed more prominently than their OWL 2 replacements? For instance,
> you have owl:distinctMembers in bold, and its replacement owl:members in
> tiny letters underneath it. What is the reason for this?
Will change owl:DataRange -> rdfs:Datatytpe and
owl:distinctMembers->owl:members. We might have a mini-list of
deprecated terms in the end

Thanks for the comment

Jie
>
> Best,
>
>        Rinke
>
>
> On 24 sep 2008, at 17:41, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu>
>> Date: Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:25 AM
>> Subject: Re: Quick reference guide
>> To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
>> Cc: "Elisa F. Kendall" <ekendall@sandsoft.com>, dlm@ksl.stanford.edu,
>> Evan Wallace <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
>>
>>
>> Alan
>>
>> I have an updated version on the wiki [1]. Please note that it is
>> still an incomplete draft. As we agreed in the last call, a complete
>> version may be finished by the next week call. We made the following
>> major changes
>>
>> * incorporate comments from Uli (reorganizing).
>> * to save space, datatype property and object property axioms are not
>> in separate sections any more. Instead, the distinction is made in
>> their domains and ranges.
>> * Sync the naming and domain/range setting with the current semantics
>> spec.
>> * Add notes that owl:DataRange and owl:distinctMembers (I assume that
>> due to Peter's proposal) are deprecated.
>> * Add some missing terms, e.g., owl:subject
>> * Add semantics to owl:hasKey
>> * Move facets to the datatype table
>> * Fill in the 3 profiles
>>
>> Elisa, Deb and Evan may have their comments later.
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Image:Owl2-refcard_2008-09-24.pdf
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Jie
>
> -----------------------------------------------
> Drs. Rinke Hoekstra
>
> Email: hoekstra@uva.nl    Skype:  rinkehoekstra
> Phone: +31-20-5253499     Fax:   +31-20-5253495
> Web:   http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke
>
> Leibniz Center for Law,          Faculty of Law
> University of Amsterdam,            PO Box 1030
> 1000 BA  Amsterdam,             The Netherlands
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Jie
http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:20:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:07 UTC