W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > September 2008

Re: Survey on titles for OWL2 Semantics documents

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 12:25:32 -0400
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <7711.1222100732@ubuhebe>

> On 22 Sep 2008, at 16:19, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> >
> >> I know people coming from a first order background who generally read
> >> too much into the "DL" when people say "DL Semantics". Indeed, I've
> >> (and many others) have wasted a lot of time trying to get people to
> >> believe that the semantics of a DL is just normal first order  
> >> semantics.
> >
> > Okay, I guess I'll have to take your word for that.
> Really? is there a problem with taking my word about my own  
> experience? Interesting.

I'm sorry if my words came across as distrustful; it was simply that I
had some difficulty reconciling your experience with my own.  In my
experience, people use the term "DL Semantics" quite comfortably.  So
when you disagreed, I had some real dissonance, which took a while to
sort out.  The reality, I'm sure, is that you're talking to different
people and in a different context -- I rarely talk to people who have a
clue what model theory is, unless they are in this WG, so of course we'd
have different experiences here.

      -- Sandro
Received on Monday, 22 September 2008 16:27:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:07 UTC