> I know people coming from a first order background who generally read > too much into the "DL" when people say "DL Semantics". Indeed, I've > (and many others) have wasted a lot of time trying to get people to > believe that the semantics of a DL is just normal first order semantics. Okay, I guess I'll have to take your word for that. How about a simplified version of Alan's proposal, using the title "Semantics of DL" or "Semantics of OWL 2 DL"? I've added that (in three different forms) to the survey (tagged "LATE ADDITION"). -- SandroReceived on Monday, 22 September 2008 15:21:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 15:21:42 GMT